Halldorf, Joel. “Unity through Spirit and Praxis: An Unsystematic Approach to Pentecostalism and the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity.” Ecumenical Review 59, no. 4 (2007): 483-490.
This morning I was following some trails along the lines of Christopraxis. An underlying question that has been following me along this research project has been one regarding the Holy Spirit. Why do we not speak more of the praxis of the Spirit, as well as the praxis of Jesus? I realize that Christopraxis is vitally important, because Jesus did not call us to come up with great doctrinal statements about God, but to actually live in a way that glorifies God through love for the other. However, in our lived reality, it is not the physical presence of Jesus in our daily experience that propels our lives, it is the presence of the Holy Spirit that animates our lives. Yes, the physical presence of Jesus in the eucharist is vitally important as we are gathered around the risen body of Jesus and sent into the world as the incarnated Gospel. Yet, it is only through the power of the Spirit that this is possible. Would it not be better to speak of the praxis of Spirit rather than the praxis of Jesus? Jesus is our exemplar, but it is the pluriform and polycentric action of the Spirit at work in, around, and through us that brings the presence of God’s reign into particular and peculiar places. (see Welker. God the Spirit)
Groome, Thomas H. Sharing Faith: A Comprehensive Approach to Religious Education and Pastoral Ministry: The Way of Shared Praxis. 1st ed. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1991.
Areas of Interest:
His primary areas of interest and research are the history, theory and practice of religious education, pastoral ministry and practical theology.
Dr. Thomas H. Groome was born in County Kildare, Ireland. Professor Groome holds the equivalent of an M.Div. from St. Patrick’s Seminary in Carlow, Ireland, an MA from Fordham University and a doctoral degree in religious education from Union Theological Seminary/Columbia University.
One of the most important findings from the DITB project is that method matters. The way in which we pursued this question is as much a part of the answer as any findings we may propose as a result. I will suggest, in this section, that the process we used in our project is a trinitarian praxis that can serve as a helpful model for missional leadership in the suburban context. The process to which I refer includes the following components: Dwelling in the Word, collaboratively creating action projects, creating spaces—both digital and physical—for ongoing communication and collaboration, and regrouping to engage in communicative, theological reflection on the actions.